Decoding America’s AI Plan

The race for AI dominance isn't just about creating the best technology.

It's a comprehensive battle for the most skilled workforce, privileged access to AI-enabled infrastructure like NVIDIA GPUs, and the raw power and water needed to fuel the data centers where progress happens.

This is pretty high stakes.

The first nation to achieve broad-scale AI adoption will have an unparalleled economic and strategic advantage.

Think of it as the modern equivalent of how Asian countries came to dominate manufacturing—by assembling the most efficient combination of labor, capital, and a favorable regulatory environment.

The entity with the best AI will become the leader, and that is the race we are in now.

A country that can automate and increase it’s GDP quickly will have stronger currency and be a world leader.

Those that are even a few months behind may never catch up.

The United States government realizes that and is looking at becoming the long-term leader in AI.

Last week they released their AI plan for America, and I took a look at what they view as our priorities.

🎙️ AI Confidential Podcast - Confidential Computing Summit 2025: Day 1 Recap & Interviews

☕️ AI Tangle - The US Unveils The "AI Action Plan" - Will it Reassert its Lead?

🔮 AI Lesson - AI Collaboration with ChatGPT and Claude

🎯 The AI Marketing Advantage - How AI Is Changing How Decisions Get Made

💡 AI CIO - Announcing Our First Authors Retreat

 📚 AIOS - This is an evolving project. I started with a 14-day free Al email course to get smart on Al. But the next evolution will be a ChatGPT Super-user Course and a course on How to Build Al Agents.

Your AI strategy is now a matter of national interest. Here’s how to stay ahead.

The White House has released "America's AI Action Plan," fundamentally reshaping the business landscape for AI development and deployment. This isn't just policy—it's economic warfare, not merely an innovation strategy. The plan positions AI as critical to national security, economic competitiveness, and global power projection. For business leaders, understanding and adapting to these changes isn't optional; it's a competitive necessity

The White House frames America's AI Action Plan around three pillars, but don't be fooled by the bureaucratic language. This isn't a balanced policy initiative—it's an economic mobilization strategy disguised as innovation policy. Each pillar serves a specific competitive purpose: Pillar I aims to out-innovate China by removing regulatory constraints, Pillar II builds the physical infrastructure to dominate AI production, and Pillar III weaponizes American technology leadership to create global dependencies.

Understanding these pillars isn't an academic exercise. Each one creates immediate obligations, medium-term opportunities, and long-term competitive advantages for businesses that position themselves correctly. The government is essentially offering a deal: align with national AI objectives and receive preferential treatment; resist or ignore these changes and face increasing regulatory friction and competitive disadvantage.

The Promise: Remove bureaucratic barriers, eliminate "ideological bias" from AI systems, and create a more permissive regulatory environment.

The reality is more nuanced. The NIST AI Risk Management Framework is being revised to remove references to "misinformation, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and climate change." Federal procurement changes will require AI systems to be "objective and free from ideological bias." The government is also promoting open source AI through improved compute access and creating regulatory sandboxes for rapid AI testing in healthcare, finance, and other critical sectors.

Industry-Specific Impacts:

Healthcare companies will benefit from FDA regulatory sandboxes allowing faster AI medical device testing, but must self-govern on ethical issues previously covered by federal guidelines.

Financial services face new procurement standards where AI systems used in government contracts must demonstrate "objectivity," creating new compliance requirements.

Technology companies will see lower barriers for startups through open-source initiatives and compute market reforms, but increased pressure on established players to compete on raw performance rather than ethical positioning.

The reality check: This is the most capital-intensive and time-sensitive pillar. America's energy grid hasn't grown meaningfully since the 1970s while China has rapidly expanded theirs.

Changes are happening in waves. Immediate changes in the next 6 months include NEPA Categorical Exclusions for data centers (faster permitting), FAST-41 process expansion for data center energy projects, and federal land availability for large-scale data center construction.

Near-term developments over 6-18 months include Clean Water Act streamlining for data center cooling systems, CHIPS Program Office reforms removing ideological requirements from semiconductor funding, and grid stabilization initiatives preventing premature power plant decommissioning.

Long-term infrastructure changes over 18+ months focus on nuclear and enhanced geothermal prioritization for data center power, workforce training programs for AI infrastructure jobs, and high-security data centers for military and intelligence applications.

This means we might be able to readopt safer nuclear in the form of molten salt reactors, a technology that was first developed by the U.S. Department of Energy, but implemented by China in recent years.

Company size determines your opportunities. Startups gain access to government-subsidized computing resources and streamlined permitting for facilities. Mid-size companies can partner with infrastructure buildout and access workforce training tax incentives. Enterprises get potential preferential energy contracts, but face new security compliance requirements for government work.

The geopolitical reality: Your AI strategy is now part of U.S. foreign policy. Export controls will expand, not contract.

Export control expansion includes enhanced chip monitoring using location verification features, semiconductor manufacturing subsystems now controlled (not just major systems), and "countries of concern" facing stricter restrictions (primarily China, but the list may expand).

Supply chain requirements mandate a domestic AI computing stack for government contractors, prohibit foreign adversary ICTS in AI infrastructure, and require due diligence for international partnerships and data flows.

Here’s a quick summary of the things you should be considering if your company has an AI plan—or if it doesn’t—I highly suggest you get one.

The deregulation of many industries with respect to AI offers a number of advantages but also some new regulations to be aware of. Here’s some of the highlights.

New opportunities include FDA AI Centers of Excellence, automated lab funding, and biosecurity partnerships. However, companies must now handle nucleic acid synthesis screening and meet AI system objectivity standards. Regulatory sandboxes should be operational by Q4 2025.

Enhanced requirements include AI system bias auditing for government contracts and stronger cybersecurity standards. The upside includes access to AI procurement toolbox and clearer regulatory guidance on AI-enabled services. Watch for increased scrutiny of international data flows and partnerships.

Major changes include supply chain reshoring incentives and defense production partnerships. Investment areas focus on next-generation manufacturing R&D and workforce retraining programs. Compliance requirements now cover export controls for robotics and automation technology.

Regulatory shifts promote open-source development while tightening export controls on advanced AI. Market changes include compute market reforms and international AI standards competition. Strategic focus should be on building "American AI alliance" partnerships globally.

The scale and speed of America's AI Action Plan demands a structured response. Companies that wait for "clarity" will find themselves locked out of opportunities and scrambling to catch up with new requirements. This three-phase framework balances urgency with strategic thinking, allowing you to act decisively while positioning for long-term advantage.

The framework recognizes that different aspects of the plan will hit your business at different times. Some changes—like export controls and procurement guidelines—require immediate attention. Others, like infrastructure benefits and workforce programs, need strategic positioning to capture maximum value. The key is moving quickly on compliance while building capabilities for competitive advantage.

Many companies are assuming reduced federal oversight means no compliance requirements. This is dangerous. The federal government is actually shifting responsibility to corporations while maintaining the right to enforce "American values" standards.

What to do instead: Develop robust internal AI governance that exceeds federal minimums. Don't wait for regulations to catch up.

Companies continuing business-as-usual with Chinese partners or using Chinese AI technologies are setting themselves up for failure. Export controls will expand, and "countries of concern" restrictions will intensify regardless of current relationships.

What to do instead: Begin China supply chain diversification immediately, regardless of short-term costs. The political trajectory is clear.

Ignoring AI's impact on your workforce while competitors leverage federal retraining programs is a costly mistake. Federal programs will subsidize competitor workforce development, putting non-participants at a disadvantage.

What to do instead: Aggressively pursue federal workforce training partnerships and tax incentives. Turn disruption into competitive advantage.

Waiting for international AI standards to stabilize before choosing sides misses the point. The U.S. is actively competing with China to set global AI standards. Neutrality isn't an option.

What to do instead: Align with U.S. standards early to influence their development and gain competitive advantage in allied markets.

Treating cybersecurity and AI security as separate concerns leaves critical vulnerabilities. AI systems are becoming primary targets for nation-state actors with capabilities that traditional cybersecurity doesn't address.

What to do instead: Implement AI-specific security measures and incident response capabilities. Integrate AI security into your overall risk management framework.

America's AI Action Plan isn't just policy—it's economic strategy disguised as national security. The federal government is picking winners and losers based on alignment with national objectives. Companies that position themselves as essential to American AI dominance will receive preferential treatment: streamlined regulations, access to infrastructure, workforce development support, and protection from international competition.

Those that don't align risk being shut out of government contracts, facing enhanced regulatory scrutiny, and losing access to the most advanced AI capabilities. The choice isn't whether to engage with this plan—it's whether to be an active participant in shaping America's AI future or a passive victim of it.

The AI race is America's to win, but only if American businesses treat it as the existential competition it truly is. Your AI strategy is now your national security strategy. Act accordingly.

The AI transformation isn't coming—it's here. Your competitive advantage depends on how quickly you adapt to America's new AI-first reality.

A new national policy document like "America's AI Action Plan" is released, and executives need a clear, concise briefing on what it means for their specific business—fast. They need to cut through the political language and get straight to the strategic opportunities and risks.

This prompt assigns the AI a specific expert role (Chief Strategy Officer) and forces it to analyze the policy through a structured business lens. By demanding a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) analysis and a prioritized list of action items, it transforms a dense document into an actionable executive summary tailored to the company's context. You should upload "America's AI Action Plan" to the chat as well to get the specifics. I'd recommend using Google Gemini or ChatGPT Deep Research to do the research on the finer points.

The Power of Interactive Prompting: One of the most effective prompt engineering techniques is making prompts interactive. This ensures the LLM has all the information needed to accomplish the task before proceeding. Rather than guessing at your context, the AI will interview you to gather specifics, resulting in a highly customized and relevant analysis.

I appreciate your support.