On October 6, 2025, OpenAI stopped being an AI model company and became a platform company, gunning for Apple, Google, and Amazon simultaneously.
What happened: OpenAI unveiled Apps SDK (turning ChatGPT into an app store), AgentKit (production infrastructure for autonomous AI), API access to GPT-5 Pro, and general availability of Codex. Combined with Instant Checkout (launched September 29), ChatGPT now handles discovery, transactions, and task automation—all in one interface.
Why it matters: OpenAI controls three layers—foundation models, developer infrastructure, and distribution (800 million weekly users). This is the iOS playbook: own the intelligence layer, provide tools, capture platform economics. Developers pay for distribution. Merchants pay for transactions. OpenAI taxes everything.
The competitive threat:
Google: Faces browser competition, search displacement, and commerce disruption across every surface.
Amazon: Instant Checkout positions AI as the new shopping interface, bypassing retail monopoly.
Microsoft: Despite $13B investment, OpenAI builds direct relationships that reduce Azure dependence.
Anthropic: Claude is competitive but lacks ChatGPT's distribution advantage.
The risk: OpenAI assumes developers want platforms (not control), users want agents (not tools), and distribution equals destiny. History says these assumptions break. AOL had 30M users. MySpace had 100M. Both lost to better alternatives.
What to watch: App directory launch (Q4 2025), enterprise agent adoption (Q1 2026), competitive response, regulatory scrutiny, and Jony Ive's $6.5B hardware bet.
Bottom line: OpenAI isn't trying to compete in AI. It's trying to become the platform where AI happens—controlling how we work, shop, and interact with computers. The next 12 months determine if this is inflection or illusion.
Sam Altman wows the crowd at Fort Mason in San Francisco on October 26.
🎙️ AI Confidential Podcast - Are LLMs Dead?
🔮 AI Lesson - 5 Tips to SuperCharge Your ChatGPT Results
🎯 The AI Marketing Advantage - OpenAI’s Latest Update Changes Everything
💡 AI CIO - The Paradox of AI Reports
📚 AIOS - This is an evolving project. I started with a 14-day free Al email course to get smart on Al. But the next evolution will be a ChatGPT Super-user Course and a course on How to Build Al Agents.
Join senior executives & enterprise leaders for AI // FORWARD, a two-day event packed with strategic frameworks, operational playbooks, and peer-to-peer exchange on how to scale AI from pilots to productivity.
This is where the future of enterprise AI strategy is shaped — in the room, not in theory.
📅 Two Days of high-impact sessions
👥 Top industry leaders & decision-makers
📈 Proven frameworks to move from AI aspiration to AI acceleration
Seats are strictly limited and selling fast — secure your spot now to be part of Charlotte’s most important AI event!
OpenAI DevDay 2025 Announces Huge AI Updates
The Platform Play That Changes Everything
The moment Sam Altman walked onto the Fort Mason stage on October 6, 2025, the competitive dynamics of artificial intelligence shifted irrevocably.
"Today, we're going to open up ChatGPT for developers to build real apps inside of ChatGPT," Altman announced to 1,500 developers and millions watching online. The applause was immediate. The implications took longer to sink in.
In 90 minutes, OpenAI transformed from AI model maker into a company that might own how we interact with computers. The Apps SDK, AgentKit, and a week-old commerce infrastructure positioned ChatGPT as the next computing platform, complete with distribution (800 million weekly users), developer tools (visual agent builders), and monetization (instant checkout).
The question isn't whether this changes software. The question is whether anyone can stop them.
The Scale Behind the Strategy
Before diving into announcements, understand the foundation:
800 million weekly active users on ChatGPT (doubled since February)
4 million developers building on the platform
6 billion tokens per minute through the API
10x increase in Codex messages since August
These aren't vanity metrics. They're gravitational pull. When you have 800 million users, developers build for you first. When developers build for you, you attract more users. OpenAI just activated that flywheel at industrial scale.
ChatGPT Becomes an Operating System
The centerpiece wasn't a model—it was architectural transformation.
The Apps SDK turns ChatGPT into a platform where third-party services render full interactive UIs directly inside chat. Spotify plays music. Canva designs posters. Zillow searches homes. Figma creates diagrams. All without leaving the chat window.
During a live demo, a user watched a machine learning lecture, asked ChatGPT to explain a concept, then used Canva to generate a poster—seamlessly transitioning between learning and creating. Apps can go full-screen, offering complete native experiences.
This is the iOS App Store moment for AI.
The SDK uses Model Context Protocol (MCP), the open standard developed by Anthropic. By choosing open protocols over proprietary tooling, OpenAI signals apps can be portable across platforms. Developers aren't vendor-locked.
But here's the genius: portability matters less than distribution. Apps may technically work on Claude or Gemini, but 800 million ChatGPT users create gravitational pull that's impossible to resist. OpenAI bets—correctly—that developers will build for the biggest audience first and maybe never multi-home.
The Commerce Layer: From Discovery to Transaction
One week before DevDay, on September 29, OpenAI turned on the economic engine: Instant Checkout.
ChatGPT users can now purchase products directly within conversations. Etsy sellers are live, with over one million Shopify merchants—Glossier, SKIMS, Spanx, Vuori—launching imminently. When someone asks "best running shoes under $100," ChatGPT shows products. Users tap "Buy" and complete transactions in-chat.
The infrastructure is the Agentic Commerce Protocol (ACP), co-developed with Stripe and open sourced. OpenAI claims product rankings are "organic and unsponsored"—but when multiple merchants sell the same item, factors include price, availability, seller quality, and whether Instant Checkout is enabled.
Translation: Merchants who don't integrate get buried.
Etsy stock jumped 16% on announcement day. That's not excitement about a new channel—it's fear about what happens if you're not on the dominant platform. OpenAI product lead Michelle Fradin told CNBC "a huge portion" of queries are shopping-related. Converting conversations into transactions doesn't just monetize users—it positions OpenAI to extract rent from every purchase.
This is Amazon-level ambition. Google Search made money on ads. ChatGPT makes money on transactions.
Combined with the Apps SDK, the architecture is complete: apps bring services in, commerce enables purchases, ChatGPT captures value on both sides. Developers pay for distribution. Merchants pay for transactions. OpenAI gets the platform tax on everything.
AgentKit: Production Infrastructure for Autonomous AI
If apps bring the world into ChatGPT, AgentKit sends AI out to get things done.
AgentKit consolidates the fragmented hell of building production agents—custom orchestration, bespoke connectors, manual evaluations, weeks of frontend work—into unified infrastructure.
During the keynote, OpenAI engineer Christina Huang built a complete workflow with two agents live on stage in under eight minutes. The room went silent, then applauded. What used to take engineering teams months took a product manager eight minutes with no code.
That's when the threat became tangible.
AgentKit has four components:
Agent Builder: Visual canvas for drag-and-drop logic flows, branching decisions, tool calls, and guardrails. Supports preview runs, inline evaluation, full versioning. Ramp went from blank canvas to functional buyer agent in hours.
ChatKit: Embeddable chat UI. Companies bring conversational AI into their products, branded to specifications, rather than redirecting to ChatGPT.
Enhanced Evaluations: Built-in tracing, debugging, metrics. Datasets for testing, trace grading, automated prompt optimization, third-party model support. Solves production's biggest problem: knowing your agent works reliably.
Connector Registry: Centralized admin for governing access to Google Drive, SharePoint, Dropbox, Microsoft Teams. IT controls what agents access while maintaining security.
Launch partners reveal the adoption pattern: Albertsons managing 2,000+ stores, HubSpot enhancing Breeze AI, Klarna handling two-thirds of support tickets with agents. These aren't experiments. They're headcount replacements.
Sam Altman discusses ChatKit, an obvious threat to onsite chatbot vendors like Intercom.
The Model Suite: Intelligence as Infrastructure
The platform needs power. OpenAI delivered three updates positioning intelligence as swappable infrastructure:
GPT-5 Pro became available via API for the first time—positioned for "PhD-level reasoning" in finance, legal, healthcare. Leading companies are already building: Cursor calls it "the smartest model we've used," Windsurf reports "half the tool calling error rate," Vercel says it's "the best frontend AI model."
Codex graduated from research to production, powered by GPT-5-Codex. Scored 74.9% on SWE-bench Verified and 88% on Aider polyglot. Daily messages increased 10x since August. New enterprise features include SDK integration, Slack workflows, and admin controls. Cisco achieved 50% faster code reviews—workflow compression, not augmentation.
Sora 2 launched in API preview with synchronized video/audio generation. Controllable duration, resolution, and aspect ratio. Altman highlighted Mattel: designers sketch toys, Sora generates 3D renderings, compressing weeks to hours. This positions video as professional infrastructure, not viral content creation. It’s also become a huge hit with Instagram and TikTok creators, but it also has the potential to be the world’s most popular deepfake creator.
Plus efficiency models: gpt-realtime-mini (70% cheaper voice) and gpt-image-1-mini (cost-efficient images). The multi-model strategy mirrors cloud infrastructure—match workload to capacity, optimize for cost and speed.
The Strategic Inflection: Three-Layer Platform
DevDay revealed OpenAI's transformation from model provider to platform company. The architecture:
Layer 1: Foundation Models — GPT-5 Pro, GPT-5-Codex, Sora 2, efficiency variants provide specialized intelligence.
Layer 2: Developer Infrastructure — AgentKit, Apps SDK, ChatKit, Connector Registry, Agentic Commerce Protocol provide orchestration without custom infrastructure.
Layer 3: Distribution — ChatGPT's 800 million users provide captive audience for apps, agents, commerce, services.
This is the iOS playbook: control intelligence (Apple controlled chips/OS), provide developer tools (Xcode), own distribution (App Store). The result: a flywheel where each layer reinforces the others.
The Competitive Battlefield
OpenAI's moves create asymmetric pressure on every major player:
Anthropic has Claude 4.5 Sonnet—competitive on reasoning and safety—but doesn't control distribution at ChatGPT's scale. MCP portability helps, but being the second ecosystem is weak positioning.
Google faces existential threats everywhere. The rumored OpenAI browser threatens Chrome. AgentKit competes with Gemini. Sora 2 challenges YouTube. Instant Checkout attacks Google Shopping. The Agentic Commerce Protocol competes with Google's AP2. OpenAI now competes across every surface simultaneously.
Microsoft, despite its $13 billion investment, should be nervous. As OpenAI builds direct user products and developer relationships, it reduces Azure dependence. The AMD chip partnership announced at DevDay diversifies beyond Microsoft infrastructure.
Amazon now faces direct commerce threat. If ChatGPT becomes where people discover and purchase, Amazon's retail dominance erodes. ACP is infrastructure for post-Amazon shopping.
Apple, absent from partnerships, faces a computing platform beyond screens—directly competing with its device-centric model. If OpenAI+Ive hardware succeeds, it fragments iOS.
The landscape consolidates into platform providers (OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, Apple) versus model specialists (Anthropic, Mistral, Cohere). The question is whether specialists survive when platforms offer "good enough" everything.
The Case Against the Platform Play
OpenAI's vision assumes four things that might not be true:
Developers want platforms, not control. History shows builders eventually chafe under constraints. Every developer has App Store horror stories. When OpenAI controls distribution, discovery, and economics, what stops monopoly rents?
Users want agents, not tools. Every autonomous agent demo works until it doesn't. One catastrophic failure—wrong flight booking, deleted files, unauthorized purchases—could crater trust.
Distribution equals destiny. AOL had 30 million users. MySpace had 100 million. Distribution advantage isn't permanent when better alternatives emerge. Network effects in AI are weaker than social networks.
Merchants will accept disintermediation. Brands fought Amazon's control for years. Will they accept OpenAI between customer and purchase? The "organic" ranking claim sounds like early Google Search. We know how that ends.
If any assumption breaks, OpenAI's platform becomes expensive infrastructure with no moat.
Hardware: The Jony Ive Wildcard
The day concluded with Altman and Jony Ive, legendary designer of iPhone, iPod, and MacBook Air. OpenAI acquired Ive's hardware startup io for $6.5 billion in May (read the strange wedding-invitation-style note back in May of this year).
Ive spoke aspirationally about devices that "make us happy, and fulfilled, and more peaceful." He referenced a "family of devices" and "15 to 20 compelling product ideas."
The irony: the man who designed the anxiety-inducing iPhone now promises to fix it with AI hardware.
Reporting suggests a palm-sized, screen-free device with always-on interaction. Ambient intelligence aware of surroundings. Technical challenges remain: compute constraints, privacy architecture, personality design.
A 2026 launch was rumored but likely optimistic. Still, the collaboration signals OpenAI wants to control endpoint hardware where AI interactions happen—reducing reliance on Apple, Google, Samsung. Whether it's revolution or another Humane AI Pin disaster remains uncertain.
Five Milestones That Matter
Whether OpenAI's platform play succeeds depends on:
App Directory Launch (Q4 2025) — Does OpenAI attract meaningful development? Are apps useful or gimmicks? Do developers multi-home or build ChatGPT-exclusive?
AgentKit Enterprise Adoption (Q1-Q2 2026) — Do Fortune 500 companies deploy agents at scale? Does reliability improve or does one catastrophic failure destroy trust?
Competitive Response (Next 6 Months) — How do Google, Anthropic, Microsoft counter? Does anyone offer a credible alternative to ChatGPT's distribution?
Regulatory Scrutiny (Ongoing) — Do governments intervene on competition, safety, governance? Does commerce integration trigger antitrust review?
Hardware Reveal (Late 2026?) — What does Jony Ive actually produce? iPhone moment or Humane Pin failure?
The next 12 months determine whether OpenAI becomes the defining platform or another overhyped company that couldn't deliver.
For the Three Stakeholder Groups
Developers: The barrier to AI applications collapsed. Visual builders, embeddable interfaces, production orchestration, 800 million users. Expect explosions in agentic applications across customer service, engineering, creative tools. But platform dependency deepens—the more you build on OpenAI, the harder to leave.
Enterprises: Governance finally matches capability. Connector Registry, admin dashboards, evaluations address compliance concerns. You can deploy agents confidently. But you're betting on OpenAI remaining reliable, secure, non-extractive. That's a big bet.
Consumers: AI shifts from reactive (answering questions) to proactive (completing tasks). You'll delegate workflows instead of asking questions. Shopping, booking, scheduling, creating—all mediated through ChatGPT. You gain convenience. You lose control. And you won't notice until it's too late to switch.
The Fire That Won't Go Out
Sam Altman ended DevDay promising "this is just the beginning." He's right—but not how he meant.
OpenAI's platform play isn't the beginning of a new era. It's the opening salvo in a war for control of computing itself. The company that brought generative AI mainstream with a simple chatbot is building comprehensive infrastructure designed to move beyond screens and browsers, with Jony Ive enlisted to shape its physical form.
Unlike previous platform wars—Windows vs. Mac, iOS vs. Android, Chrome vs. Safari—this one won't be decided by who makes the best products. It will be decided by who controls the intelligence layer.
In 12 months, we'll know if DevDay 2025 was inflection or illusion. Either ChatGPT becomes the gateway to a new computing paradigm—where work, creativity, and commerce converge—or it becomes another overhyped platform play that couldn't deliver.
But here's what's certain: OpenAI just raised the stakes for everyone. A week rolling out commerce infrastructure, then DevDay unveiling developer tools, agent orchestration, and a vision where AI mediates most digital interactions. They're not playing to compete in AI—they're playing to become the platform where AI happens.
The fire OpenAI set on October 6 won't burn out. It will consume everything in its path—competitors who can't match the platform, businesses that don't integrate, developers who bet wrong.
Or it will burn OpenAI itself. There's no middle ground when you're trying to replace the operating system of reality.
The war for the AI platform is on. And based on DevDay 2025, OpenAI believes they've already won.
Sora 2 Mobile App - The Sora 2 Mobile app is in invite only phase but despite that it’s number 1 in the Apple App store. So far it’s only available on iPhone.
Apps SDK - Apps in ChatGPT fit naturally into conversation. You can discover them when ChatGPT suggests one at the right time, or by calling them by name. Apps respond to natural language and include interactive interfaces you can use right in the chat.
AgentKit - AgentKit enables developers to build and manage multi-agent workflows visually using the Agent Builder and Connector Registry. With ChatKit, teams can embed customizable, chat-based agent interfaces directly into their products.
Codex - Since the Codex cloud agent launched in research preview in May, Codex has steadily evolved into a more reliable and capable coding collaborator. You can now work with it everywhere you code—in your editor, terminal, and the cloud, all connected by your ChatGPT account.
Prompt of the Week
Cut and paste the prompt below into ChatGPT and it will start a conversation for you to interact with and analyze how these specific updates from AI will affect your business.
Answer honestly - the AI will adapt to your specific situation
Push back - if something doesn't fit your business, say so
Save the output - you'll get a customized strategic roadmap
Re-run monthly - as new features launch, reassess opportunities
Pro tip from theaienterprise.io: Don't treat this as one-and-done. Treat it like a strategic workout. Run it again in 30 days. The models are improving fast, and so should your strategy.
You are an AI strategist helping me understand how recent ChatGPT announcements will impact my business. Use the strategic frameworks from theaienterprise.io to guide our conversation.
Recent key announcements:
- Apps in ChatGPT (October 2025) - ChatGPT becomes an app platform with SDK
- AgentKit - Build autonomous AI agents that take actions
- ChatGPT Pulse - Proactive AI assistant doing research for you
- GPT-5 coming soon with o3 reasoning engine
- Deep Research with integrations (SharePoint, GitHub, Dropbox)
- Sora 2 for video generation
- Hardware devices being developed
Let's work through this interactively. Ask me ONE question at a time and wait for my response before proceeding.
Start by asking about:
1. My business type and industry
2. My role (leader/developer/operator)
3. Current biggest challenges or opportunities
After understanding my context, guide me through The AI Enterprise's strategic framework:
**STRATEGIC CURIOSITY ASSESSMENT**
- What am I spending the most time on?
- Could AI now do this faster, better, or autonomously?
- Which announcement creates the biggest opportunity for my specific situation?
**IMPACT ANALYSIS** (for each relevant announcement)
- Immediate tactical plays (0-3 months)
- Strategic positioning (3-12 months)
- Competitive implications (what if I don't act?)
**ACTION PRIORITIZATION**
Using theaienterprise.io's approach:
- Context: My company's top strategic goals and key challenges
- Action Areas: Three business functions where AI adds value
- Output: High-level roadmap with business value, resources needed, risks
**TRANSFORMATION vs. PLUG-IN**
Help me determine if I need:
- Simple integration (plug-in approach)
- Process redesign (transformation approach)
- Platform shift (rebuilding around AI)
After each section, provide:
- Specific examples relevant to my industry
- Competitors who might be moving on this
- Common mistakes to avoid
- One concrete next step
CRITICAL PRINCIPLES from theaienterprise.io:
✓ AI isn't failing; it's being underutilized
✓ Treat AI as a strategic tool to expand capacity, not just cut costs
✓ Success requires iteration, not one-time deployment
✓ Leadership must show visible commitment
✓ Balance automation with human expertise
At the end, create a prioritized action plan with:
1. Quick wins (this week)
2. Strategic initiatives (this quarter)
3. Platform decisions (this year)
4. Skills/team development needed
Be direct. No jargon. No hyperbole. Write like you're briefing my executive team.
Ready? Ask me your first question.
Editor’s note: In last week’s edition, “What I Learned About AI from Two Hours in College”, we misstated how Facilities & Administrative (F&A) rates apply. While universities may charge ~60% F&A, that rate is applied to the research portion of the grant, not the total award.
Example: A 60% F&A rate on a $100,000 research grant adds $60,000 overhead, for a $160,000 total award—so overhead is 37.5% of the total, not 60%. This framing supports more accurate budgeting and stakeholder reporting.
Try this week’s productivity prompt and drop your takeaway in the comments.
I appreciate your support.
Your AI Sherpa,
Mark R. Hinkle
Publisher, The AIE Network
Connect with me on LinkedIn
Follow Me on Twitter
